US Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Mental Health Services Logo and Link


 

Communicating in a Crisis:

Risk Communication Guidelines for Public Officials

 

 


Table of Contents

Skip to Content (Skip Left Menubar)

Administrator's Message

Introduction

Communications Fundamentals

Communicating Complex, Scientific, and Technical Information

Myths, Principles, and Pitfalls

Understanding and Working with the Media

Correcting Errors and Rumor Control

Assessing Personal Strengths and Weaknesses

Presenting Information at Public Meetings

Recognizing Opportunities to Speak Out

Suggested Reading and Resources

References


Download (pdf format, click here for acrobat reader)

Order this Publication


Arrow Graphic, link to go back to the previous pageArrow Graphic, link to proceed to next page  

Myths, Principles, and Pitfalls

Disseminating information without regard for the complexities and uncertainties of risk is not effective risk communication. Well-managed communications efforts will help ensure that your messages are well formulated, effectively transmitted, and result in the intended public response. Consider how the process works and some general principles for improving effectiveness.

RISK COMMUNICATION MYTHS AND TRUTHS

Myths often interfere with the development of an effective risk communication program. Consider these myths and prepare to take action to dispel and overcome them (Chess, et al., 1989).

MYTH: RISK COMMUNICATION IS MORE LIKELY TO ALARM THAN CALM PEOPLE.

Truth: Not if done properly. Educate and inform, don’t simply alert and alarm. Give people the chance to express their concerns, ask questions and receive accurate answers.

MYTH: COMMUNICATION IS LESS IMPORTANT THAN EDUCATION. IF PEOPLE KNEW THE TRUE RISKS, THEY WOULD ACCEPT THEM.

Truth: Education is achieved through effective communication. Pay as much attention to your process for dealing with people as you do to explaining the content of the information.

MYTH: MANY ISSUES THAT ARISE IN TIMES OF CRISIS ARE TOO DIFFICULT FOR THE PUBLIC TO UNDERSTAND.

Truth: No, they aren’t. Part of your job is to help the public understand these issues no matter how complex they may be. The public may not make technical decisions, but their opinions deserve consideration by those who are making those decisions.

MYTH: RISK COMMUNICATION IS NOT MY JOB.

Truth: Yes, it is. As a public servant, you have a responsibility to the public. Integrate communication with the public into your job and help others do the same.

MYTH: IF WE LISTEN TO THE PUBLIC, WE MAY DIVERT LIMITED RESOURCES TO CONCERNS THAT ARE NOT A GREAT THREAT TO PUBLIC HEALTH.

Truth: Listening to and communicating with the public does not mean that you must set agendas and priorities based solely on prevailing public concerns. Part of your job is to manage issues and expectations. The public’s concerns cannot be ignored, but neither can they necessarily dictate policy. The better informed people are, the more likely it will be that the public’s and your opinions on priorities are aligned.

EARNING TRUST AND BUILDING CREDIBILITY

Your ability to establish constructive communication will be determined, in large part, by whether your audiences perceive you to be trustworthy and believable. Consider how they form their judgments and perceptions. Key factors in assessing trust and credibility are: empathy and caring; competence and expertise; honesty and openness; and dedication and commitment. (Covello, 1992; Covello, 1993).

Five Rules for Building Trust and Credibility:
(Covello and Allen, 1988)

1. Accept and involve the public as a partner. Work with and for the public to inform, dispel misinformation and, to every degree possible, allay fears and concerns.

2. Appreciate the public’s specific concerns. Statistics and probabilities don’t necessarily answer all questions. Be sensitive to people’s fears and worries on a human level. Your position does not preclude your acknowledging the sadness of an illness, injury, or death. Do not overstate or dwell on tragedy, but do empathize with the public and provide answers that respect their humanity.

3. Be honest and open. Once lost, trust and credibility are almost impossible to regain. Never mislead the public by lying or failing to provide information that is important to their understanding of issues.

4. Work with other credible sources. Conflicts and disagreements among organizations and credible spokespersons create confusion and breed distrust. Coordinate your information and communications efforts with those of other legitimate parties.

5. Meet the needs of the media. Never refuse to work with the media. The media’s role is to inform the public, which will be done with or without your assistance. Work with the media to ensure that the information they are providing the public is as accurate and enlightening as possible.

BUILDING SUPPORT

Unless you are assured that the subject to be discussed will be tightly confined to your area of expertise, it is usually not best to serve as the sole spokesperson on an issue. Crisis situations have multiple facets and raise a range of questions.

Having people on hand who can answer those questions facilitates and speeds the communications process and better ensures that informational voids don’t develop. Identify those colleagues and other officials and experts who can speak to the issues that are most likely to be raised and rely on their help when it’s needed. (It is likely that most of the individuals on your risk communications team will also be those on whom you rely for spokesperson support.)

Caution! Make sure goals and messages are understood and coordinated among participants.

Conflicting information, particularly when it comes from equally trusted sources, creates confusion and erodes confidence. Know what other spokespersons intend to say and support their messages.

If something that you don’t agree with is said, or if wrong information is presented, do not publicly contradict the statement or disagree with the spokesperson. Resolve the matter in private and present the new information to the public as a simple correction or clarification of a previous statement and not as one opinion having prevailed over another.

PROBLEM: At a news conference, the city manager has just cited a statistic that understates the extent of a problem.

SOLUTION: Immediately after the news conference raise the issue with the city manager in private. Then allow the city manager to provide the new information to the press along with an explanation of how the mistake was made.

AVOIDING PITFALLS

ABSTRACTIONS – Use examples, stories, and analogies to make your point.

Don’t assume there is a common understanding between you and your audience (even when you are using stories and analogies to make your point).

ATTACKS – Respond to issues, not to people. Strive to end debates, not further them.

Don’t respond to an attack with an attack of your own.

ATTITUDE/NON-VERBAL MESSAGES – Remain calm, attentive and polite. Adopt a relaxed, neutral physical stance.

Don’t let your feelings interfere with your ability to communicate positively. Never convey disgust, frustration, indifference, or smugness. Never lose your temper. Don’t allow your body language, your position in the room, or your dress to affect your message.

BLAME – Accept your share of responsibility for a problem.

Don’t try to shift blame or responsibility to others and don’t magnify the fault to be found in others in order to deflect criticism or minimize your culpability.

COSTS – Focus on the benefits to be derived, not on the costs entailed. If costs are an issue, voice respect for the need for responsible stewardship of public funds.

Don’t discuss issues in terms of their dollar value, or complain about a lack of funds.

GUARANTEES – It is better to offer a likelihood, emphasizing progress and on-going efforts.

Don’t make comments like, “There are no guarantees in life.”

HUMOR – Avoid it. If used, direct it at yourself.

Don’t use it in relation to safety, or health, or in describing risk.

JARGON – Define all technical terms and acronyms.

Don’t use language that may not be understood by even a portion of your audience.

LENGTH OF PRESENTATIONS – Plan, practice and deliver a cogent 15-minute presentation.

Don’t believe that what you are saying is inherently more interesting than other topics and therefore warrants more time. By the same token, don’t end your remarks after 15 minutes if there are important audience questions in need of answering.

NEGATIVE ALLEGATIONS – Refute allegations succinctly.

Don’t repeat allegations or refer to them in ways that give them credibility.

NEGATIVE WORDS AND PHRASES – Use positive or neutral terms.

Don’t cite national problems, or make highly-charged analogies, e.g., “This is not Love Canal.”

“OFF THE RECORD” – Always assume everything you say and do is part of the public record.

Don’t make side comments or “confidential” remarks. (The rule is: Never say anything that you are not willing to see printed on the front page of a newspaper.)

PERSONAL IDENTITY – Speak for the organization. Use the pronoun “we.”

Don’t give the impression that you, alone, are the authority on the issues being raised or the sole decision-maker. Never disagree with the organization you are representing, e.g., “Personally, I don’t agree,” or “Speaking for myself . . .,” or “If it were me . . . .”

PROMISES – It is better to state your willingness to try. Promise only what you can deliver.

Don’t make promises you can’t keep and never make a promise on behalf of someone else.

RELIANCE ON WORDS ALONE – Use visuals and hand-outs to emphasize key points.

Don’t rely entirely on the spoken word to explain your point.

SPECULATION – Stick to the facts of what has, is, and will be done.

Don’t speculate on what could be done, or on what might happen, or on possible outcomes other than the intended one(s), or about worst case scenarios.

STATISTICS – Use them to illuminate larger points and to emphasize trends and achievements.

Don’t make them the focus of your remarks, or overuse them.

TECHNICAL DETAILS AND DATA – Focus on empathy, efforts and results.

Don’t try to fully inform and educate audiences on the minutia of issues.

MANAGING HOSTILE SITUTATIONS

Issues of health and safety can arouse strong emotions, including anger and hostility. Dealing ineffectively with hostility can erode trust and credibility. Remember, though, public hostility is usually directed at you as a representative of an organization, not you as an individual, so don’t take it personally.

DIFFUSING ANGER AND HOSTILITY

Acknowledge the existence of hostility. The worst thing you can do is pretend it’s not there.

Practice self-management. Send the message that you are in control.

Control your apprehension. Anxiety undercuts confidence, concentration, and momentum.

Be prepared. Practice your presentation and anticipated questions and answers.

Listen. Recognize people’s frustrations—communicate empathy and caring.

Assume a listening posture. Use eye contact.

Answer questions thoughtfully. Turn negatives into positives and bridge back to your messages.

 

   
    Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Logo
   
 
This page was last updated on  06 November, 2002
SAMHSA is An Agency of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
     
    Email Questions to info@samhsa.gov  
     Privacy Statement  |  Site Disclaimer  |   Accessibility